I LOVE puzzling through all of the mysteries in finding relatives in a mass of records and photos and matching up photos to identities, etc. But in doing so, there is obviously a bias towards finding a match, because that's what you want.
I found myself doing that recently. Specifically, there is this wedding photo. We've not yet identified the bride or the groom. That sucks! So, I'm running through a million different theories of who it could be.
I don't recognize them. There is no date on the photo. My dad had a theory around the time he was gathering up these photos a while back based on a superficial resemblance to another identified photo. Others who knew that woman said it wasn't a match. And, indeed upon closer examination, it wasn't.
Recently, I DID match some "unknowns" from photographs to my tree -- which is REALLY satisfying. In doing so, I got to thinking whether there was any connection between these newly identified people and this woman above. I think my bias has gotten the better of me because I was entertaining the theory that this wedding description would provide corroboration for the identity:
I was pretty excited because the description of the dress was close to what you see in the photo -- namely, ". . . white satin fitted bodice, square neckline edged in lace and long sleeves." Not bad, eh? Until you consider how that description matches up with a TON of wedding dresses. To give myself some kind of a break, I do notice that a lot more women took the "wearing white at the wedding" thing "seriously" back then and there were no shortage of women married in far less formal attire, but still. I think I need to take the weekend off.
No comments:
Post a Comment